Fashion / Style

Inside stylist and fashion consultant Ilkin Kurt’s wedding mood board

For someone fluent in image-making, stylist and fashion consultant Ilkin Kurt’s most compelling gesture may be what she chose not to show.

Her wedding wasn’t released as a traditional narrative but as a mood board: a custom Esse Studios gown, archival references, polaroids, protective talismans. Less a record than a study in restraint, it resists mythology. By offering fragments instead of fullness, she keeps authorship intact – sharing the feeling while withholding the architecture.

 

As someone who works so intuitively with image and reference, how did you begin shaping your own wedding wardrobe? Was there a starting point – a feeling, a fabric, an archival image – or did it evolve more organically?

This wedding was literally planned in around 3–4 weeks. My Mom was leaving Australia after spending quite some time here in Sydney and her biggest wish was to see us get married. One month before her departure, we decided to make her wish come to life.

How much did your professional eye influence your decisions? Did you find yourself curating your looks the way you might build a visual narrative for a project?

In professional work, I’m comfortable pushing a concept further for impact. For my wedding, I had to actively pull back. I didn’t want to look like I had styled myself as a “concept.” I wanted to look like myself at my most centred.

 

"In professional work, I’m comfortable pushing a concept further for impact. For my wedding, I had to actively pull back."

 

You’ve built a living mood board of the day rather than sharing it in full – what does that format allow you to express that traditional wedding documentation doesn’t?

I feel like traditional wedding coverage answers the question “What happened?” and I'm not interested in that at all. Creating a living mood board, by contrast, answers a different question: what did it feel like? I feel like this format allowed me to express memory in a way that wasn’t chronological; it was associative. Also, by withholding the “full story,” you retain something private.

As an image archivist, you spend your time preserving and re-contextualising other people’s histories. What was it like turning that lens onto your own?

While I was editing and archiving these pictures, that professional detachment collapsed. I knew the backstory behind every frame: you know the usual stuff – the nerves hidden behind a practiced smile – but at the same time how all my amazing friends and family made this day actually happen. What surprised me most was how quickly the photographs began to harden into “the official version.” Friends and family responded to them as evidence: this is what the day was. Joyful. Radiant. Complete. And I felt the familiar archival tension between record and reality. Even my own memories started to soften around the edges, nudged by the authority of the images you know.

 

"What surprised me most was how quickly the photographs began to harden into 'the official version'. Friends and family responded to them as evidence: this is what the day was."

 

Was there a particular reference – historical, cinematic, personal – that informed your looks?

My wedding gown was custom made by one of my dearest friends, Charlotte Hicks of Esse Studios. We only had a few conversations about it, as we speak the same language aesthetically and morally, so the process was very organic and easy. Lee Radziwill's evening gowns were part of the inspiration for the veil – Char said to me "Do we want some drama?” and I instantly knew she would give me the best one. I have also always loved the way Audrey Hepburn looked in this image that was taken by Gilles Bensimon in 1988. Purity, elegance and embracing age. I wore a P.Johnson Femme dress between lunch and the after party and the after party dress was a black piece by Stella McCartney. My inner collector's voice was like “Bring out some of your archival pieces to shine!” So, I did.

How did it feel collating the fragments afterwards – the polaroids, fabric swatches, jewellery, beauty references – into this distilled mood board? Did the act of editing shift your memory of the day at all?

There’s something almost archaeological about laying everything out and asking, what was this day, really? Editing inevitably shifts the memory. Not because it falsifies it, but because it clarifies it. In choosing what belongs, you’re deciding what the day stands for now. And that reframing can be surprisingly tender – it allows you to preserve the emotional core while gently editing out the noise.

 

“Editing inevitably shifts the memory. Not because it falsifies it, but because it clarifies it. In choosing what belongs, you’re deciding what the day stands for now.”

 

Weddings often come with a lot of external expectations. How did you stay anchored in your own aesthetic language?

Well, I didn't have much time to really think through every single detail. I trusted the process and I truly trusted my dear friends and their vision about me. The flower arrangements were done by Fleurette by Christelle Scifo; makeup and hair were done by Teneille Sorgiovani. Victoria Pearson was the celebrant. Tatsiana Shevarenkova was an all-day legend. And Lesley Crawford opened her beautiful 1960s warehouse for our after party. What I can suggest is defining your non-negotiables – and separating tradition from obligation would really help.

What role did sentimentality play versus silhouette and form? Were there heirlooms or emotional anchors woven into the looks?

Silhouette carries the aesthetic vision; sentimentality carries the memory, right? One ensures the look feels beautiful. The other ensures it feels yours. My Mom wanted to attach a little evil eye into my dress, which is a very traditional thing to do in Turkish culture. Protection from the good and bad eyes. It was a surprise for me to say yes, it made me feel like I was carrying something from my childhood, my country... It was something sentimentally heavy that I didn't know I needed.

 

Now that some time has passed, do you see the mood board as documentation, artwork, or something in between?

Mood boards often begin as documentation tools. They’re practical. Functional. Strategic. But, once the day has passed, something interesting happens: the mood board stops being a plan, and it becomes a record of intention. I guess it is sort of an artwork, as it edits reality.

 


Experience the Sublime issue in its entirety this March, available on newsstands from Monday 9 March 2026, and through our online shopFind a stockist near you.

 

Stay inspired, follow us.

  • TikTok icon
  • X icon

Join the RUSSH Club


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.